The content of this site is protected by Copyright Law. (Title 17, US Code) - July 2002 - P. Montgomery Contact the author Unposted.com: The trial of David Westerfield CLICK HERE FOR TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS I kind of wished I played the Lottery that day to tell you the truth because maybe it was my day to win the Lottery. Who the heck knows? Brenda Van Dam Extract from the Larry King Show - December 3rd 2002 Trial: Westerfield's jacket Feldman: "If any of the items would have had blood on it, you would've spotted it?" Clerk: "Yes," April 30th 2005 - James Allen Selby March 2005 - The confession 01/12/03 - MEET THE EXPERTS ! 01/12/03 - "new secret" motions unsealed ! 01/08/03 - The videotaped interrogation 01/06/03 - The others 1981 - Adam Walsh 1989 - Tiffany Sessions 1991 - Jared Michael Negrete 1994 - Amanda Dougherty 1999 - Michael Negrete THE INTERVIEW Intro David Westerfied My theory about DNA - I Computer and porn 12/7/02 - CHILD PORN RING & VAN DAM CASE 12/6/02 - BABYSITTER & TRIAL DINNER BRENDA VAN DAM on Larry King Live - 12/03/2002 DANIELLE VAN DAM killed at home Danielle's discovery: WILL MEDIA TELL THE TRUTH? Video rape: 1 LITTLE GIRL AND 2 MEN Identifying Danielle's bedroom Danielle's bedroom (2), Van Dams vacuuming Danielle's last day Blood on jacket (updated) Fingerprints DEATH SENTENCE MEET THE JURY WHY WESTERFIELD BECAME SUSPECT!!! (updated) PLEA BARGAIN MY POINT OF VIEW NEWS TRIAL EVIDENCE Neal Westerfield Molestation in the family Testimonies principal witnesses: parents and sexpals 911 call Damon Van Dam's testimony I Damon Van Dam's testimony II Damon Van Dam's cross-exam I Damon Van Dam's cross-exam II My comments of Damon Van Dam's testimony Brenda Van Dam's testimony I Brenda Van Dam's testimony II Brenda Van Dam's cross-exam I Brenda Van Dam's cross-exam II Brenda Van Dam's cross-exam III My comments of Brenda Van Dam's testimony My comments of the Van Dams testimony Barbara Easton Denise Kemal's testimony Denise Kemal's cross-exam I Denise Kemal's cross-exam II Richard Brady's testimony I Richard Brady's testimony II Richard Brady's cross-exam Keith Stone's testimony Keith Stone's cross-exam What is a penalty phase - definition Penalty phase and the niece Niece testimony (transcript) Niece cross-exam (transcript) My questions My comments Events related on this site are not fictional and are available through public records, conclusions and comments are made by the author.

Plea bargain, my point of view. I received a lot of emails from people asking what I think of the plea bargain story published by media: I have to say that I am amazed to see so many people believe everything printed in media without a shadow of a doubt; without asking themselves any questions. I believe there was a plea bargain, this is the way the American Justice System works. I also believe the offer didn't come from Westerfield but from the prosecution and I believe Westerfield rejected their offer, otherwise, why would two cops attempt to visit Westerfield in jail THE DAY AFTER Danielle's body was found? When a man has been charged for a crime and has retained a lawyer, any communication has to be made through his lawyer, this is the law. Why did these two cops, Ott and Keyser (*) , take their chance in breaking the law AFTER Danielle's body was found? I see only one reason, they were still trying to pressure David Westerfield to confess or to take a plea bargain. Westerfield refused to see them. In the Stephanie Crowe's case, cops obtained a taped confession from Stephanie's brother who was 14 year old. After two days of questioning, alone, without parents or a lawyer, Michael gave the police a videotaped confession. (*) According to an article published in the San Diego Tribune in April 2002: in 1989 one of the cops was acquitted of beating up a suspect in a drug case. In 2000, an investigator for the District Attorney's Office wrote an internal memo to a prosecutor accusing both cops of falsifying statements in an affidavit in order to get an arrest warrant.