unposted true crime
The content of this site is protected by Copyright Law. (Title 17, US Code) - July 2002 - P. Montgomery

Contact the author


Unposted.com: The trial of David Westerfield
CLICK HERE FOR TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS

I kind of wished I played the Lottery that day to tell you the truth because maybe it was my day to win the Lottery.
Who the heck knows?
Brenda Van Dam
Extract from the Larry King Show - December 3rd 2002

david westerfield jacket blood
Trial: Westerfield's jacket
Feldman: "If any of the items would have had blood on it, you would've spotted it?"
Clerk: "Yes,"

April 30th 2005 - James Allen Selby
March 2005 - The confession
01/12/03 - MEET THE EXPERTS !
01/12/03 - "new secret" motions unsealed !
01/08/03 - The videotaped interrogation
01/06/03 - The others
1981 - Adam Walsh
1989 - Tiffany Sessions
1991 - Jared Michael Negrete
1994 - Amanda Dougherty
1999 - Michael Negrete
THE INTERVIEW
Intro
David Westerfied
My theory about DNA - I
Computer and porn
12/7/02 - CHILD PORN RING & VAN DAM CASE
12/6/02 - BABYSITTER & TRIAL DINNER
BRENDA VAN DAM on Larry King Live - 12/03/2002
DANIELLE VAN DAM killed at home
Danielle's discovery: WILL MEDIA TELL THE TRUTH?
Video rape: 1 LITTLE GIRL AND 2 MEN
Identifying Danielle's bedroom
Danielle's bedroom (2), Van Dams vacuuming
Danielle's last day

Blood on jacket (updated)
Fingerprints
DEATH SENTENCE
MEET THE JURY

WHY WESTERFIELD BECAME SUSPECT!!!
(updated)
PLEA BARGAIN
MY POINT OF VIEW

NEWS

TRIAL EVIDENCE
Neal Westerfield
Molestation in the family
Testimonies principal witnesses:
parents and sexpals

911 call
Damon Van Dam's testimony I
Damon Van Dam's testimony II
Damon Van Dam's cross-exam I
Damon Van Dam's cross-exam II
My comments of Damon Van Dam's testimony
Brenda Van Dam's testimony I
Brenda Van Dam's testimony II
Brenda Van Dam's cross-exam I
Brenda Van Dam's cross-exam II
Brenda Van Dam's cross-exam III
My comments of Brenda Van Dam's testimony
My comments of the Van Dams testimony
Barbara Easton
Denise Kemal's testimony
Denise Kemal's cross-exam I
Denise Kemal's cross-exam II
Richard Brady's testimony I
Richard Brady's testimony II
Richard Brady's cross-exam
Keith Stone's testimony
Keith Stone's cross-exam

What is a penalty phase - definition
Penalty phase and the niece
Niece testimony (transcript)
Niece cross-exam (transcript)
My questions
My comments

Events related on this site are not fictional and are available through public records, conclusions and comments are made by the author.

In its issue dated October 2002, the San Diego Magazine published an article called: "To catch a killer". According to the San Diego magazine, a police source declared that Westerfield broke in the Van Dam's house to get the babysitter, supposedly at their home that night checking the Van Dam's kids. Westerfield was surprised to discover that, instead of the babysitter, Damon Van Dam was home. He ducked into Danielle's bedroom, hit her and killed her.

This "police source" seems to believe that Westerfield was so aroused by a girl he had never seen before, who he had no idea what she looked like, that he decided to break into an unknown house in the middle of the night to get her. Disappointed not finding a babysitter he killed Danielle !

This allegation doesn't make sense and the babysitter is another demonstration of Brenda Van Dam's creative mind.

Brenda Van Dam told Westerfield that a babysitter could be at home this upcoming Friday night and she told him that several days before. Since we learned that, while at the bar she was telling everybody about Danielle's whereabouts. We also learned that Brenda bragged about being a mother. It's hard to believe that nobody asked her where her husband was and hard to believe she didn't tell everyone that Damon Van Dam was home with Danielle and her other kids.

Brenda, Denise and Barbara knew that there was no babysitter at the Van Dam's house the night of February 1st 2002. How could Westerfield be the only one believing there would be a babysitter?

What makes sense is that Danielle was killed at home, in her own bedroom, as we always thought she was. This could explain the blood found on her pajamas and T-shirt.

The problem is that if she was killed at home, how, now, would cops explain the fingerprint and blood they claimed they found in Westerfield's RV and on his jacket?

If Danielle Van Dam was killed at home, there is no way she could have left her fingerprint on the headboard in Westerfield's RV. Where did the fingerprint come from? If she was killed at home, how could police find her blood in the RV and on Westerfield's jacket BUT NOT IN HIS HOUSE?

According to the San Diego Union Tribune, Westerfield's lawyers are now asking for a delay in the sentencing scheduled for November 22nd 2002 to investigate the possibility of Danielle Van Dam having been killed at home and the possible evidence supporting this allegation made by the police source in the San Diego magazine.

I believe that if Danielle Van Dam was killed at home, the whole story we heard during the trial will prove to be a fabrication created by law enforcement, nothing else.

Base on this fairy tale, 12 jurors sentenced a man to death.