
| The content of this site is protected by Copyright Law. (Title 17, US Code) - July 2002
- P. Montgomery Contact the author Unposted.com: The trial of David Westerfield
![]() Trial: Westerfield's jacket Feldman: "If any of the items would have had blood on it, you would've spotted it?" Clerk: "Yes," April 30th 2005 - James Allen Selby March 2005 - The confession 01/12/03 - MEET THE EXPERTS ! 01/12/03 - "new secret" motions unsealed ! 01/08/03 - The videotaped interrogation 01/06/03 - The others 1981 - Adam Walsh 1989 - Tiffany Sessions 1991 - Jared Michael Negrete 1994 - Amanda Dougherty 1999 - Michael Negrete THE INTERVIEW Intro David Westerfied My theory about DNA - I Computer and porn 12/7/02 - CHILD PORN RING & VAN DAM CASE 12/6/02 - BABYSITTER & TRIAL DINNER BRENDA VAN DAM on Larry King Live - 12/03/2002 DANIELLE VAN DAM killed at home Danielle's discovery: WILL MEDIA TELL THE TRUTH? Video rape: 1 LITTLE GIRL AND 2 MEN
Blood on jacket (updated) Fingerprints DEATH SENTENCE MEET THE JURY WHY WESTERFIELD BECAME SUSPECT!!! (updated)
TRIAL EVIDENCE Neal Westerfield Molestation in the family What is a penalty phase - definition Penalty phase and the niece Niece testimony (transcript) Niece cross-exam (transcript) My questions My comments Events related on this site are not fictional and are available through public records, conclusions and comments are made by the author. | In its issue dated October 2002, the San Diego Magazine published an article called: "To catch a killer". According to the San Diego magazine, a police source declared that Westerfield broke in the Van Dam's house to get the babysitter, supposedly at their home that night checking the Van Dam's kids. Westerfield was surprised to discover that, instead of the babysitter, Damon Van Dam was home. He ducked into Danielle's bedroom, hit her and killed her. This "police source" seems to believe that Westerfield was so aroused by a girl he had never seen before, who he had no idea what she looked like, that he decided to break into an unknown house in the middle of the night to get her. Disappointed not finding a babysitter he killed Danielle ! This allegation doesn't make sense and the babysitter is another demonstration of Brenda Van Dam's creative mind. Brenda Van Dam told Westerfield that a babysitter could be at home this upcoming Friday night and she told him that several days before. Since we learned that, while at the bar she was telling everybody about Danielle's whereabouts. We also learned that Brenda bragged about being a mother. It's hard to believe that nobody asked her where her husband was and hard to believe she didn't tell everyone that Damon Van Dam was home with Danielle and her other kids. Brenda, Denise and Barbara knew that there was no babysitter at the Van Dam's house the night of February 1st 2002. How could Westerfield be the only one believing there would be a babysitter? What makes sense is that Danielle was killed at home, in her own bedroom, as we always thought she was. This could explain the blood found on her pajamas and T-shirt. The problem is that if she was killed at home, how, now, would cops explain the fingerprint and blood they claimed they found in Westerfield's RV and on his jacket? If Danielle Van Dam was killed at home, there is no way she could have left her fingerprint on the headboard in Westerfield's RV. Where did the fingerprint come from? If she was killed at home, how could police find her blood in the RV and on Westerfield's jacket BUT NOT IN HIS HOUSE? According to the San Diego Union Tribune, Westerfield's lawyers are now asking for a delay in the sentencing scheduled for November 22nd 2002 to investigate the possibility of Danielle Van Dam having been killed at home and the possible evidence supporting this allegation made by the police source in the San Diego magazine. I believe that if Danielle Van Dam was killed at home, the whole story we heard during the trial will prove to be a fabrication created by law enforcement, nothing else. Base on this fairy tale, 12 jurors sentenced a man to death. |