
"When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Contact the author Unposted.com: The trial of David Westerfield
![]() Trial: Westerfield's jacket Feldman: "If any of the items would have had blood on it, you would've spotted it?" Clerk: "Yes," April 30th 2005 - James Allen Selby March 2005 - The confession 01/12/03 - MEET THE EXPERTS ! 01/12/03 - "new secret" motions unsealed ! 01/08/03 - The videotaped interrogation 01/06/03 - The others 1981 - Adam Walsh 1989 - Tiffany Sessions 1991 - Jared Michael Negrete 1994 - Amanda Dougherty 1999 - Michael Negrete THE INTERVIEW Intro David Westerfied My theory about DNA - I Computer and porn 12/7/02 - CHILD PORN RING & VAN DAM CASE 12/6/02 - BABYSITTER & TRIAL DINNER BRENDA VAN DAM on Larry King Live - 12/03/2002 DANIELLE VAN DAM killed at home Danielle's discovery: WILL MEDIA TELL THE TRUTH? Video rape: 1 LITTLE GIRL AND 2 MEN
Blood on jacket (updated) Fingerprints DEATH SENTENCE MEET THE JURY WHY WESTERFIELD BECAME SUSPECT!!! (updated)
TRIAL EVIDENCE Neal Westerfield Molestation in the family What is a penalty phase - definition Penalty phase and the niece Niece testimony (transcript) Niece cross-exam (transcript) My questions My comments Events related on this site are not fictional and are available through public records, conclusions and comments are made by the author. The content of this site is protected by Copyright Law. (Title 17, US Code) - July 2002 - P. Montgomery | The prosecutor seeks the death penalty, not two years community service. Westerfield in 50 years of his life, has proven being a good father, an intelligent and honest man. He sometimes drinks too much and has hard time keeping a wife but... he is not the only one. At least, he doesn't beat them every friday night like a lot of other men do. Beside one D.U.I., he never had any trouble with the law. Despite his clean background, he begins as being the only suspect in the kidnapping and murder of Danielle Van Dam... based solely on Brenda Van Dam's declarations. Sure, the accusation is based on evidence but none of this evidence can prove any participation of Westerfield in the crime. Until recently i stupidly believed the behavior of a man during his life should be taken into consideration, especially when this man is accused of the most horrible crime. The death of Danielle Van Dam is horrible. I try hard not to think about what this poor little girl went through but I can't. She deserves justice. Whoever committed the crime has to pay the price. I wanted to know how/when/why David Westerfield committed the crime. I have heard no explanation. I wanted to know if David Westerfield could possibly be the ONLY SUSPECT. I haven't found that at all. I have been asked if investigators were aware of cases I report. I don't know if they were, I hope they are now. Damon Van Dam volunteered the information about some of the cases I talk about. I simply filled some gaps and provided my comments. There are people that still believe Westerfield is the man, I can't change their opinion. There are people for whom democracy means they have the right to speak and others only have the right to listen. They got the wrong dictionary. Thanks to everyone of you for taking the time to read my thoughts. I wish, for Danielle Van Dam, that justice will be honestly served. It will serve all of us. If you missed the links listed on page one of my site, please read the 4 pages article: San Diego Justice system and elections and this article that I renamed: David Westerfield -- the new Stephanie Crowe? |