unposted.com David Westerfield
The content of this site is protected by Copyright Law. (Title 17, US Code) - July 2002 P. Montgomery

Contact the author


Unposted.com: The trial of David Westerfield
CLICK HERE FOR TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS

I kind of wished I played the Lottery that day to tell you the truth because maybe it was my day to win the Lottery.
Who the heck knows?
Brenda Van Dam
Extract from the Larry King Show - December 3rd 2002

david westerfield jacket blood
Trial: Westerfield's jacket
Feldman: "If any of the items would have had blood on it, you would've spotted it?"
Clerk: "Yes,"

April 30th 2005 - James Allen Selby
March 2005 - The confession
01/12/03 - MEET THE EXPERTS !
01/12/03 - "new secret" motions unsealed !
01/08/03 - The videotaped interrogation
01/06/03 - The others
1981 - Adam Walsh
1989 - Tiffany Sessions
1991 - Jared Michael Negrete
1994 - Amanda Dougherty
1999 - Michael Negrete
THE INTERVIEW
Intro
David Westerfied
My theory about DNA - I
Computer and porn
12/7/02 - CHILD PORN RING & VAN DAM CASE
12/6/02 - BABYSITTER & TRIAL DINNER
BRENDA VAN DAM on Larry King Live - 12/03/2002
DANIELLE VAN DAM killed at home
Danielle's discovery: WILL MEDIA TELL THE TRUTH?
Video rape: 1 LITTLE GIRL AND 2 MEN
Identifying Danielle's bedroom
Danielle's bedroom (2), Van Dams vacuuming
Danielle's last day

Blood on jacket (updated)
Fingerprints
DEATH SENTENCE
MEET THE JURY

WHY WESTERFIELD BECAME SUSPECT!!!
(updated)
PLEA BARGAIN
MY POINT OF VIEW

NEWS

TRIAL EVIDENCE
Neal Westerfield
Molestation in the family
Testimonies principal witnesses:
parents and sexpals

911 call
Damon Van Dam's testimony I
Damon Van Dam's testimony II
Damon Van Dam's cross-exam I
Damon Van Dam's cross-exam II
My comments of Damon Van Dam's testimony
Brenda Van Dam's testimony I
Brenda Van Dam's testimony II
Brenda Van Dam's cross-exam I
Brenda Van Dam's cross-exam II
Brenda Van Dam's cross-exam III
My comments of Brenda Van Dam's testimony
My comments of the Van Dams testimony
Barbara Easton
Denise Kemal's testimony
Denise Kemal's cross-exam I
Denise Kemal's cross-exam II
Richard Brady's testimony I
Richard Brady's testimony II
Richard Brady's cross-exam
Keith Stone's testimony
Keith Stone's cross-exam

What is a penalty phase - definition
Penalty phase and the niece
Niece testimony (transcript)
Niece cross-exam (transcript)
My questions
My comments

Events related on this site are not fictional and are available through public records, conclusions and comments are made by the author.

David Westerfield, one of the neighbors of the Van Dam family, is a 50-year divorced engineer described by his friends as a nice fellow, a teddy-bear look alike. He is also the prime and only suspect in the abduction from the first day of the investigation.

Trial show that almost everything was implicating Westerfield in Danielle's death: he was at the same bar where Brenda was recruiting fellow sex partners, he took a suspicious trip with his motorhome and physical evidence was found: pedophile material on his home computer, Danielle’s fingerprint, Danielle’s blood.

The night of the abduction Westerfield was witnessed as being filthy drunk when leaving the bar.

How did he manage to enter the Van Dam’s house to kidnap Danielle, leaving not one single trace of incriminating evidence, without waking any members of the Van Dam family, nor attracting the dog’s interest?

Westerfield had never been inside the Van Dam’s house, he couldn’t know the layout of their home. He couldn’t know Danielle’s bedroom was upstairs next to her parents bedroom, next to the two other bedrooms where her brothers were asleep and... he was drunk!

When recalling the events directly following Danielle's disappearance, her mother declares: "I asked Damon if Danielle had slept in her bed".
That obviously implies the little girl used to sleep elsewhere. How could Westerfield know where Danielle would sleep that night?

After Westerfield’s arrest; the discovery of their daughter’s body, I didn't see any sign of sorrow or grief for the loss of Danielle in the Van Dam's behavior while appearing on just about every network and news program.

Nothing in Westerfield’s past indicates the man was ever sexually attracted by young kids, or had exhibited any sign of violent behavior. The only trouble he had with the law was a D.U.I. long ago. He makes a good living as an engineer and denies any involvement in the crime. He pleaded “not guilty” to all charges.

The death penalty sought by the prosecutor was based on the physical evidence incriminating David Westerfield, now, I believe there is only one way for him to get his life and dignity back: show that someone else could have killed Danielle.

I wonder if Brenda and Damon Van Dam realised that their lifestyle will be revealed during the trial. Day after day, the parents kept denying what was written in Police reports taken just a few hours after the crime was committed.
Having nothing to hide it appears they couldn't stop lying.
Why?

3 - The Copycat