
| The content of this site is protected by Copyright Law. (Title 17, US Code) - July 2002 P. Montgomery Contact the author Unposted.com: The trial of David Westerfield
![]() Trial: Westerfield's jacket Feldman: "If any of the items would have had blood on it, you would've spotted it?" Clerk: "Yes," April 30th 2005 - James Allen Selby March 2005 - The confession 01/12/03 - MEET THE EXPERTS ! 01/12/03 - "new secret" motions unsealed ! 01/08/03 - The videotaped interrogation 01/06/03 - The others 1981 - Adam Walsh 1989 - Tiffany Sessions 1991 - Jared Michael Negrete 1994 - Amanda Dougherty 1999 - Michael Negrete THE INTERVIEW Intro David Westerfied My theory about DNA - I Computer and porn 12/7/02 - CHILD PORN RING & VAN DAM CASE 12/6/02 - BABYSITTER & TRIAL DINNER BRENDA VAN DAM on Larry King Live - 12/03/2002 DANIELLE VAN DAM killed at home Danielle's discovery: WILL MEDIA TELL THE TRUTH? Video rape: 1 LITTLE GIRL AND 2 MEN
Blood on jacket (updated) Fingerprints DEATH SENTENCE MEET THE JURY WHY WESTERFIELD BECAME SUSPECT!!! (updated)
TRIAL EVIDENCE Neal Westerfield Molestation in the family What is a penalty phase - definition Penalty phase and the niece Niece testimony (transcript) Niece cross-exam (transcript) My questions My comments Events related on this site are not fictional and are available through public records, conclusions and comments are made by the author. | David Westerfield, one of the neighbors of the Van Dam family, is a 50-year divorced engineer described by his friends as a nice fellow, a teddy-bear look alike. He is also the prime and only suspect in the abduction from the first day of the investigation. Trial show that almost everything was implicating Westerfield in Danielle's death: he was at the same bar where Brenda was recruiting fellow sex partners, he took a suspicious trip with his motorhome and physical evidence was found: pedophile material on his home computer, Danielles fingerprint, Danielles blood. The night of the abduction Westerfield was witnessed as being filthy drunk when leaving the bar. How did he manage to enter the Van Dams house to kidnap Danielle, leaving not one single trace of incriminating evidence, without waking any members of the Van Dam family, nor attracting the dogs interest? Westerfield had never been inside the Van Dams house, he couldnt know the layout of their home. He couldnt know Danielles bedroom was upstairs next to her parents bedroom, next to the two other bedrooms where her brothers were asleep and... he was drunk! When recalling the events directly following Danielle's disappearance, her mother declares: "I asked Damon if Danielle had slept in her bed". That obviously implies the little girl used to sleep elsewhere. How could Westerfield know where Danielle would sleep that night? After Westerfields arrest; the discovery of their daughters body, I didn't see any sign of sorrow or grief for the loss of Danielle in the Van Dam's behavior while appearing on just about every network and news program. Nothing in Westerfields past indicates the man was ever sexually attracted by young kids, or had exhibited any sign of violent behavior. The only trouble he had with the law was a D.U.I. long ago. He makes a good living as an engineer and denies any involvement in the crime. He pleaded not guilty to all charges. The death penalty sought by the prosecutor was based on the physical evidence incriminating David Westerfield, now, I believe there is only one way for him to get his life and dignity back: show that someone else could have killed Danielle. I wonder if Brenda and Damon Van Dam realised that their lifestyle will be revealed during the trial. Day after day, the parents kept denying what was written in Police reports taken just a few hours after the crime was committed. Having nothing to hide it appears they couldn't stop lying. Why? 3 - The Copycat |